Supply Chain Compliance

Supply chain due diligence law (the CSDDD, modern slavery statements, conflict minerals rules) demands demonstrable process across supplier bases that number in the thousands. That workload is exactly what agent fleets are for, and exactly where unaccountable automation is most dangerous: a due diligence programme that cannot show its working is a liability with a progress bar.

CueCrux makes the programme provable at the level of individual findings. When agents research a supplier's sanctions exposure, adverse media, certification status, or ownership chain, each finding carries a signed receipt to its source, hash-chained so the assessment file is tamper-evident. Where evidence is thin, the record is honest about it, which matters when the legal standard is adequate process rather than perfect knowledge.

Reassessment becomes a diff rather than a redo: rerun the sweep, compare receipted findings, and escalate what changed. Human gates hold judgement where the directive expects it, on high-risk suppliers and remediation decisions, with approvals landing as signed facts.

Attribution answers the operational question too: what does due diligence cost per supplier, per tier, per jurisdiction? Measured from receipts, not estimated.