usecase
Product Launch
Ship AI features with the compliance evidence already minted
Teams shipping AI-powered products discover the same thing at the worst time: the EU AI Act and its neighbours judge you on evidence accumulated during development, not on documentation written before launch. CueCrux front-loads the evidence. Classify the feature's risk early, attach the class to its plans and work items, and the machinery does the rest for the life of the build: retrievals and mutations receipted, oversight decisions gated, logs hash-chained from the first commit-adjacent action onwards.
Readiness assessment itself runs receipted. Agents sweep the applicable requirements for the product's characteristics and target markets, and each obligation lands in the checklist with a receipt to its regulatory source. Outstanding items are visible on the live work board; nothing gets lost between the compliance spreadsheet and the release branch.
The launch decision is a gate, literally. A high-risk release routes to a named human whose approval cannot be auto-granted past a timeout and lands as a signed fact. If the product generates content, C2PA output attestation is available behind a default-off flag for transparency obligations.
The pay-off arrives after launch: when a regulator, customer, or incident asks how the system was governed during development, the answer is a replay, not a retrospective.