How is CueCrux different from other companies in the agent space?

Most agent-adjacent companies sell visibility or orchestration on top of mutable logs. CueCrux's difference is architectural and hard to retrofit:

• The record is evidence. Every state mutation is Ed25519-signed and hash-chained on an append-only spine. Verification works offline; tamper rejection is a release-blocking CI gate. Nobody has to trust our dashboard, which is precisely what makes it sellable to auditors and regulators.
• One machinery, not two. The compliance surface is the operating surface. There is no export-time reconstruction that can drift from production truth, and no "audit mode" premium constructed as an afterthought.
• Controls close the loop. RCX policy refuses with signed receipts; revocation settles with per-agent acks and attestation. Competitors show you a problem; the control plane also stops it recurring.
• Honest economics. Attribution and billing both resolve to receipts. "Nothing estimated" is an unusual claim in this market because most architectures cannot make it.

The free, no-account local daemon compounds this: distribution economics of a developer tool, revenue profile of governance infrastructure.