What market gap does CueCrux fill?

Enterprises adopted AI agents faster than they built the ability to govern them. The result is a concrete, named gap: fleets performing thousands of actions a day whose operators cannot prove what happened, attribute what it cost, or demonstrate that a revoked permission is actually gone.

Adjacent categories do not close it. Observability tools visualise logs, which are editable assertions. Agent frameworks orchestrate work but keep no evidentiary record. Compliance tooling reconstructs after the fact, which is exactly the posture regulators are moving away from.

CueCrux sits underneath as the governance control plane: signed receipts for every state mutation, attribution with nothing estimated, revocation with proof of settlement. The EU AI Act's record-keeping and oversight obligations turn this from good practice into procurement requirement, on a statutory timetable.

The wedge is a free local daemon with no account: adoption starts with a single developer, and governance revenue follows the fleet.